Home » Posts tagged 'luigi zingales'
Tag Archives: luigi zingales
“The Game Is Rigged”: From Luxurious Lake Como Villa, Finance Professor Admits “QE Adds To Inequality”
“The Game Is Rigged”: From Luxurious Lake Como Villa, Finance Professor Admits “QE Adds To Inequality”
While attending the ultra-exclusive Ambrosetti Workshop, University of Chicago finance professor Luigi Zingales took a few minutes to discuss income inequality in an interview with Bloomberg.
We were delighted that the irony of being at a luxurious villa on the shores of Lake Como discussing income inequality wasn’t lost on the Booth PhD: “First of all it’s a bit funny to discuss about income inequality here at this luxurious villa in Como next to George Clooney’s villa”
As Jeb Bush might say, “Please laugh.”
Moving on: when asked if central bank policy is making people feel that they’ve really lost out, Zingales reiterates what we’ve known all along, namely that the real consequences of central bank actions don’t matter, what matters is simply how people perceive the central bank and its actions. If people are told enough by smart people on television that the economy has been fixed, and the market is a reflection of the fundamentals, then they’ll blindly support anything the fed does. After all, as long as whatever voodoo is going on over at the Eccles building is pushing 401k balances higher, then it must be right.
He then goes on as far as stating that capitalism in the U.S. has failed and been converted into a perverted, mutant, crony version and that “the game is rigged.”
“I think that people are willing to support capitalism if capitalism is providing growth, providing better income for everybody, and also if it has some at least appearance of being fair. Unfortunately, none of these conditions are in place today in the United States. I think that growth is limited, and disproportionately goes to a small fraction of the population. And there is a sense that the game is rigged.”
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…
Economists vs. Economics
Economists vs. Economics
Ever since the late nineteenth century, when economics, increasingly embracing mathematics and statistics, developed scientific pretensions, its practitioners have been accused of a variety of sins. The charges – including hubris, neglect of social goals beyond incomes, excessive attention to formal techniques, and failure to predict major economic developments such as financial crises – have usually come from outsiders, or from a heterodox fringe. But lately it seems that even the field’s leaders are unhappy.
Paul Krugman, a Nobel laureate who also writes a newspaper column, has made a habit of slamming the latest generation of models in macroeconomics for neglecting old-fashioned Keynesian truths. Paul Romer, one of the originators of new growth theory, has accused some leading names, including the Nobel laureate Robert Lucas, of what he calls “mathiness” – using math to obfuscate rather than clarify.
Richard Thaler, a distinguished behavioral economist at the University of Chicago, has taken the profession to task for ignoring real-world behavior in favor of models that assume people are rational optimizers. And finance professor Luigi Zingales, also at the University of Chicago, has charged that his fellow finance specialists have led society astray by overstating the benefits produced by the financial industry.
This kind of critical examination by the discipline’s big names is healthy and welcome – especially in a field that has often lacked much self-reflection. I, too, have taken aim at the discipline’s sacred cows – free markets and free trade – often enough.
But there is a disconcerting undertone to this new round of criticism that needs to be made explicit – and rejected. Economics is not the kind of science in which there could ever be one true model that works best in all contexts. The point is not “to reach a consensus about which model is right,” as Romer puts it, but to figure out which model applies best in a given setting.
Read more at https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/economists-versus-economics-by-dani-rodrik-2015-09#xgLwXaG0L2E8thiJ.99
