‘Forgotten, but not gone’: How governments have deliberately ignored the safety of contaminated sites in England – and why climate change makes this worse
‘The Metablog’, No.18, Podcast:
This is an over thirty-year long story about my involvement with contaminated sites, and helping communities to get action to clean them up[1]. It’s innately connected to my home town, Banbury: An average small town, on the border between the Midlands and the South East; yet in the 1980s, this place taught me about the issues of waste disposal and land contamination. Not because it was exceptional, but because these issues affect almost every community across Britain.
Page bookmarks
(use section number as a hotkey to jump to it, and ‘0’ to jump back to the bookmarks list).
- Introduction.
- ‘What’s past is prologue’.
- The farce of ‘Section 143’.
- Cameron & Osborne deregulate further.
- ‘High-tech’ modern landfills are this generation’s toxic legacy to future generations.
- The meeting I knew I would have one day.
- Conclusion: Solving this begins by valuing the future of our children, not abstract land values.
Generations of my family have lived here, from at least the early Nineteenth Century. By word of mouth I learned about local industrial sites, what they did, and where their waste was buried.
The problem with today’s highly mobile society is that such local knowledge is increasingly rare; and before the late 1970s, records of waste or pollution releases were rarely kept. Despite warnings about the issues of contaminated land since the 1960s, governments have failed to act to create a comprehensive system to track down, assess, and where necessary decontaminate these sites.
Just like other major ecological issues – such as climate change – the obstacle to change are the economic vested interests that pressure decision-makers not to act. Valuing profit over the lives of ordinary people, they prevent effective action.
‘What’s past is prologue’
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…
