According to deep background sources, Millie Weaver was abducted by deep state operators today and is being held under the false authority of deep state operatives. She was not arrested by any lawful process, and there was no legitimate “grand jury” indictment.
Understand that this is a fast-moving story, and new information may help clarify this story as details unfold. But to the best of what we know so far, Millie Weaver is now a political prisoner being held by the deep state.
If these sources are correct, Millie Weaver and her husband are victims of a “snatch-and-grab” operation, and a counterfeit indictment document may have been produced by the deep state, but it would have been created completely outside any legitimate process of law, much like Obama’s fake birth certificate.
Millie Weaver is now a political prisoner of the deep state. This is what they do to enemies who expose them.
But as the “Google whistleblower” Zach Vorhies explains, “sorry deepstate. You can’t stop what’s coming.” The files have already been released!
Since her abduction, a multitude of users have uploaded her film to Brighteon.com, the free speech alternative to YouTube. Brighteon.com links have all been blacklisted by Facebook and Twitter, for all the obvious reasons, but you can now watch the full documentary below:
Direct link to Brighteon.com:
Brighteon.com/fde592b6-4efd-415a-8268-f29bf288ac65
Alternative, censorship-resistant link:
Brlghteon.com/fde592b6-4efd-415a-8268-f29bf288ac65
The hashtag #FreeMillie is already trending on social media.
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…
The War on Free Speech – U.S. Department of Justice Subpoenas Reason.com Over Comment Section
June 10, 2015
The War on Free Speech – U.S. Department of Justice Subpoenas Reason.com Over Comment Section
The United States Department of Justice is using federal grand jury subpoenas to identify anonymous commenters engaged in typical internet bluster and hyperbole in connection with the Silk Road prosecution. DOJ is targeting Reason.com, a leading libertarian website…
The D.C. court was right — the government won’t start issuing grand jury subpoenas every time someone writes “my husband left underwear on the bathroom floor again; I could just kill him.” But they won’t because they don’t have the time, inclination, or the resources.
Instead, they will use their discretion to decide when to bring their vast power into play to pierce the anonymity of internet assholes (or for that matter, people who may have valid points on political matters but express them in the wrong fashion). That discretion is much more likely to be exercised where, as here, the person being trash-talked is a powerful federal judge in the district of that U.S. Attorney’s Office, a judge that the office must appear before every damned day. The power is more likely to be exercised on behalf of establishment political figures, not outsiders. The power is more likely to be exercised when it is consistent with the politics of the administration.
The D.C. court implies that we can trust federal prosecutors to use the grand jury power to pierce the anonymity of political firebrands even when their rhetoric is clearly protected by the First Amendment. That the government will investigate anonymous political rhetoric in even-handed fashion, whether that rhetoric comes from a magazine known to be friendly to the government and its establishment, or one that is, like Reason, prone to question both.
– From the excellent Popehat article: Department Of Justice Uses Grand Jury Subpoena To Identify Anonymous Commenters on a Silk Road Post at Reason.com
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…