Prime Minister Tsipras and Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, a game theory expert, have been playing a game of chicken with the troika ever since their Syriza party won the elections last January. All the Greek government wants is to be able to choose the shape of Greek public policy. All the troika – and some of its European partners, namely Germany – demands is for Greece to honor its commitments if it wants more ‘help.’ Unfortunately, the two demands are irreconcilable because they have only one aspect in common: austerity. Greek, indeed European, fiscal policy has been very austere over the past several years. The euro’s rise was pegged to the Deutschmark while the overarching preoccupation of the ECB has been to control inflation, forcing a collapse of the generally Keynesian policies that characterized the economies of many of the euro zone partners. Since the euro came into use in 2002, European governments have faced pressure to cut costs. Since 2010, despite the alleged Greek profligacy, Athens has cut spending more drastically than any other government in Europe. There have been double digit reductions in pension payments, jobs, salaries and investment. Unemployment has reached an optimistic 25%, youth unemployment is beyond 65%.
Home » Posts tagged 'game theory'
Tag Archives: game theory
The Greek People Should Vote No
The Greek People Should Vote No
The troika’s aid has been pegged to Greece showing some signs of growth. Of course the spending cuts, with corresponding tax increases, have only dug austerity deeper. No growth is possible under such circumstances; Europe as a whole must change its tune and resume a more Keynesian outlook if Greece and the euro zone are to survive in the long run. Many will cite Greece’s moral obligations to repay its loans and honor its obligations.
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…
Game theory and the king’s new clothes
Game theory and the king’s new clothes
I’ll admit to being a bit obsessed with Syriza and the Eurozone at the moment (here and here): it is by some way the most interesting development at the moment in both politics and economics. And I’m also interested in the idea that Yanis Varoufakis’ background teaching game theory might have some bearing on the outcome of the talks with the Eurozone, especially now that he has gone out his way, in the New York Times to say that exactly the opposite is true. It’s worth spending a bit of time on this.
Selfish players
In an op-ed article in the NYT, he spelt this out.
“Game theorists analyze negotiations as if they were split-a-pie games involving selfish players. … The trouble with game theory, as I used to tell my students, is that it takes for granted the players’ motives. In poker or blackjack this assumption is unproblematic. But in the current deliberations between our European partners and Greece’s new government, the whole point is to forge new motives. To fashion a fresh mind-set that transcends national divides, dissolves the creditor-debtor distinction in favor of a pan-European perspective, and places the common European good above petty politics, dogma that proves toxic if universalized, and an us-versus-them mind-set.”
As it happens, Bill O’Grady has done a game-theoretical analysis of the Syriza-Eurozone negotiations, and it’s easy to see why the “negotiations” are not going well. This is the pay-off table from Syriza’s side of the desk.
…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…
Epsilon Theory – Salient Partners | Now There’s Something You Don’t See Every Day, Chauncey
Epsilon Theory – Salient Partners | Now There’s Something You Don’t See Every Day, Chauncey.
Like every other male homo sapiens I know, I watch a lot of sports. There’s only one team that I watch as a fan – the University of Alabama football team (my grandfather and uncle played there, and I was raised in the Church of Bear Bryant) – by which I mean that these are the only games I watch where I could not care less about the quality of the gameplay, but only care about winning in as lopsided a fashion as possible. For example, while the rest of the world thought the 2011 Championship game where Alabama beat LSU 21-0 was a miserably boring affair, a Bama fan like myself thought it was a performance of absolute beauty. Roll Tide.
Fans and gamblers care about outcomes. For everyone else watching a game, we’re there for something else. One of those things – and for me the centerpiece of any non-Bama, non-Hunt-participant sporting event – is the chance that we might see something we’ve never seen before. For example, a few weeks back I was watching the Sunday night Giants-Cowboys game on television even though I don’t really care about the New York Giants and the last time I rooted for the Dallas Cowboys was when I was 6 years old and wearing footie pajamas with a big blue star on them. A year from now I will no longer remember (and don’t care today) who won that game. But I will never forget the greatest catch I have ever seen – Odell Beckham, Jr. throwing himself backwards, reaching out behind his head, and cleanly catching the long pass with 3 fingers of one hand for a touchdown. That’s why I watch the games – for moments like this where something happens that I’ve never seen before and almost certainly never will again.