Home » Posts tagged 'shale oil' (Page 13)

Tag Archives: shale oil

Olduvai
Click on image to purchase

Olduvai III: Catacylsm
Click on image to purchase

Post categories

Post Archives by Category

Why The Oil Price Collapse Is U.S. Shale’s Fault

Why The Oil Price Collapse Is U.S. Shale’s Fault

The present oil price collapse is because of over-production of expensive tight oil. The collapse occurred because of the inability of the world market to support the cost of the new expensive oil supply from shale, oil sands and deep water. Demand was progressively destroyed during the longest period of sustained high oil prices in history from 2010 through 2014.

Since the early 2000s, the price of oil was largely insensitive to the fundamentals of supply and demand as long as prices were less than about $90 per barrel. The chart below shows world liquids supply minus demand (relative supply surplus or deficit), and WTI oil price.

WorldLiquidsSurplus

Figure 1. World liquids relative surplus or deficit (production minus consumption) and WTI crude oil price adjusted using the consumer price index (CPI) to real February 2015 U.S. dollars, 2003-2015. Source: EIA, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

(click to enlarge image)

In mid-2004 and mid-2005, the relative supply surplus was much greater than it has been during the 2014-2015 price collapse yet prices continued to rise. When oil traders perceive supply limits and rising prices, price below some critical threshold is not an issue. They are willing to carry the cost of storage and interest to hold the commodity in the future when it will be more valuable.

Related: Finally Some Good News For Oil Prices

In 2004, the relative supply surplus reached 1.9 million barrels per day and in 2005, it reached 4.1 million barrels per day. By contrast, the greatest supply surplus in the current oil price collapse was 1.7 million barrels per day in January 2015.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Who’s To Blame For The Oil Price Crash?

Who’s To Blame For The Oil Price Crash?

When we think of the recent drop in oil prices, the question is not only who started it, but who’s responsible for keeping the prices falling.

Probably no one would dispute that the price plunge began with the eager and copious production of oil from shale formations in the United States. From the American perspective, that was beneficial because it was bringing energy self-sufficiency to a country with the reputation as the world’s largest importer of oil.

Despite unproven concerns about hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a common way to extract oil and gas from underground shale rock, the practice has proven extremely productive. And that’s the source of the oil glut that began driving down prices in late June 2014.

Related: Oil Rebound May Come Sooner Than Expected

Even one of fracking’s biggest supporters, legendary oil man T. Boone Pickens, blames the US shale boom for triggering the price slough that’s been hammering the energy industry. He’s doesn’t subscribe to the environmental concerns about fracking, but he says he can also recognize when his industry has latched on to too much of a good thing.

“I’ve fracked over a thousand wells,” Pickens, the chairman of BP Capital Management, said March 23 at a panel discussion in Monterey Calif. “I’ve never had a failure on one of them. … Texas, Oklahoma lead in fracking wells and it has been a great success for both those states.”

Yet Pickens thinks it’s time for US companies to take a break from their frantic production to allow oil prices to achieve some balance. In an interview with theFinancial Times published March 18, he said shale companies have “overproduced,” and that it’s up to them to rein in output to help restore oil prices to a more profitable level.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

This Is What Will Determine If Oil Prices Go Up Or Down

This Is What Will Determine If Oil Prices Go Up Or Down

It appears as if oil prices could be on the verge of a rebound, with new data showing that the U.S. oil patch is hitting an inflection point. While specific shale regions – such as North Dakota’s Bakken and Texas’ Eagle Ford – have posted production declines, overall U.S. oil output managed to edge up in recent months.

But now that U.S. production has finally dipped, it may augur a new phase for oil markets in which production cutbacks could lead to higher prices. The Energy Information Administration reported on April 1 that total U.S. oil production fell for the week ending on March 27, falling 36,000 barrels per day to 9.38 million barrels per day.

U.S.OilProduction

The prior week’s production level of 9.42 million barrels per day was the highest level in three decades. If output continues to decline, mid-March 2015 could mark the peak of U.S. oil output, at least for the foreseeable future.

Related: Three Triggers That Will Send Oil Crashing Again

That would raise the possibility that oil prices have bottomed out. Where do they go from here? Is it possible that oil prices could dip any lower? If they are indeed about to rise, will they rise quickly or stay flat for a while before gradually ascending?

There are several major determinants of oil prices one should consider.

1. U.S. Production. The first and most important thing to watch is the aforementioned levels of U.S. production. Weekly figures come out from the EIA and we should get a better sense of where U.S. oil flows are going next week. Consistent weekly drops will put upward pressure on prices.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Germany’s Merkel Comes Out as Basically a U.S. Agent

Germany’s Merkel Comes Out as Basically a U.S. Agent

On Wednesday, April 1st, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet approved a measure to bring fracking (the patents for which are owned mainly by “large American companies, including Halliburton, Baker Hughes and Schlumberger”) into Germany. This is a prelude not only to U.S. President Obama’s secret Trans-Atlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) pact with Europe to subordinate national laws and regulations to trans-national mega-corporate panels that will be dominated by U.S. firms and that will override the participating nations’ environmental and labor regulations and consumer protections (and harm European economies generally), but it is also a major step toward removing Europe from Russia’s energy-market, and bringing U.S. and European oil companies to dominate there instead.

German Economic News headlined on April 1st, “Precursor to TTIP: Federal Government brings Fracking to Germany,” and reported that:

The controversial shale gas extraction (fracking) process is coming to Germany: In order not to provoke excessively large protests at home, the federal government highlighted that fracking is initially allowed only for testing purposes. But in fact, the draft law of the Federal Environment and the Federal Ministry of Economics, approved today by the the Cabinet, also allows subsequent large-scale extraction of shale gas….

 

The American interest in a continuing conflict simmering in Ukraine also causes Europeans to fear that Russian gas could stop and thus drive Europe to give up our still considerable resistance against fracking. Some US politicians have personal interests, such as the US Vice President Biden, whose son works for a Ukrainian fracking company.

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Revisiting the Shale Oil Hype: Technology versus Geology

Revisiting the Shale Oil Hype: Technology versus Geology

The press has been all abuzz the past few weeks speculating on what the drop in oil prices will mean for U.S. shale oil (tight oil) production. Pundits have been falling over themselves quoting various estimates of the breakeven cost of production in this play or that, and rushing to be the first to declare a peak in the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Niobrara or wherever.  The Baker-Hughes rig count, which comes out every Friday, has become a must-read for people who probably had never heard of it a few months ago. Even the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), based on estimates, suggests production is declining in three big shale oil plays.

The industry, on the other hand, has been more circumspect. They point to productivity gains being made in drilling and completion technology that lower costs, and suggest they are developing a backlog (aka “fracklog”) of wells that have been drilled but not completed, hanging in abeyance for the inevitable oil price rise (half or more of the cost of completing a well is the fracking). Keeping a stiff upper lip in the face of harsh pricing realities, many companies are telling investors that despite slashing capital expenditures on drilling and exploration (in some cases by more than 40%), production will be maintained and even rise. Others, such as Whiting, are putting themselves up for sale or, in the case of Quicksilver, declaring bankruptcy.

In my Drilling Deeper report published last October I stuck my neck out and made projections of future production by play based on drilling rates and well quality, not price, although price and drilling rates are closely linked. This was based on an analysis of all well production data by play which showed:

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

New IEA Data May Indicate A Slowdown In Rig Count Drop

New IEA Data May Indicate A Slowdown In Rig Count Drop

The IEA OMR is out early this month hence April’s edition of vital statistics comes early. The March 2015 Vital Statistics is hereEIA oil price and Baker Hughes rig count charts are updated to the end of March 2015, the remaining oil production charts are updated to February 2015 using the IEA OMR data. The main oil production changes from January to February are:

• World total liquids up 80,000 bpd
• OPEC down 90,000 bpd
• N America up 220,000 bpd
• Russia and FSU up 10,000 bpd
• UK and Norway up 100,000 bpd (compared with February 2014)
• Asia up 30,000 bpd

1. Global oil production is declining slowly but remains just above its long-term trend. Just over 94.04 Mbpd was produced in February.

2. The recovery in the oil price in February reversed in March and WTI has tested its January lows. Spreading conflict in the Middle East adds further complexity to the price dynamic.

3. The plunge in US oil rig count has slowed significantly although it continues falling slowly. This may signal a new phase of the oil price war that is discussed at the end of this post.

4. I anticipate that the price bottom may be in, but that price will bounce sideways along bottom for several months until we see significant falls in OECD production. Whilst there are signs that global production is falling slowly there is as yet little sign of a significant drop in US production.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Calls For Immediate Shutdown Of Illegal California Injection Wells As Regulators Host ‘Aquifer Exemption Workshop’

Calls For Immediate Shutdown Of Illegal California Injection Wells As Regulators Host ‘Aquifer Exemption Workshop’

While California legislators are calling for immediate closure of the thousands of injection wells illegally dumping oil industry wastewater and enhanced oil recovery fluids into protected groundwater aquifers, regulators with the state’s Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) were holding an “Aquifer Exemption Workshop” in Long Beach on Tuesday.

Just 23 out of the 2,500 wells DOGGR officials have acknowledged the agency improperly permitted to operate in aquifers that contain potentially drinkable water have so far been closed down — 11 were closed downlast July and 12 more were shut down earlier this month.

Given the urgency of the situation, it certainly does not look good that DOGGR made time to hold a workshop to outline “the data requirements and process for requesting an aquifer exemption under the Safe Drinking Water Act,” when it has given itself a two-year deadline to investigate the thousands more wells illegally operating in groundwater aquifers that should have been protected under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act all along.

Last Friday, state legislators sent Governor Jerry Brown a letter calling for the immediate closure of the wells, writing that “the decision to allow thousands of injection wells to continue pumping potentially hazardous fluids into protected aquifers is reckless.”

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

The Oil Price Crash and Economic Slow Down in China

The Oil Price Crash and Economic Slow Down in China

Two of the factors in the oil price crash are well constrained: 1) oversupply of expensive light tight oil (LTO) in North America and 2) the decision of OPEC to not cut production. The third possible factor of weak global demand is not so easy to constrain but the current oil price crash bears many of the same hallmarks as the 2008 finance crash. This has lead to speculation that weak global demand, stemming from masked economic woes, may also be playing a key role.

In response to this, commenter Javier sent me a collection of 10 charts that he had collected from various internet sources together with his commentary that forms the basis of this joint-post. These charts tell a clear story of a major economic slowdown in China. This most certainly will be implicated in the ongoing oil price weakness. The $10,000 question is will China make a cyclical rebound like it has done in the past?

Figure 1 GDP growth. YoY = year on year % change. Note many charts are not zero scaled. China’s economy is still growing at 7% per year but has slowed down dramatically from 12% 5 years ago. Such change has happened before, notably between 1994 and 1998 linked to the Asian currency crisis. The oil price hit $10 per barrel in 1998. And in 2007 to 2009 an even more sharp fall related to the financial crash was also accompanied by a crash in the oil price.

Javier points out that in a country with rapid population growth a higher GDP growth rate is required than in a country with stable or declining population and he suggests that 7% is in reality approaching recessionary levels.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

The Shale Debt Redux

The Shale Debt Redux

Shale debt, falling prices and slack demand has tight oil producers in trouble. And yet, there is still burgeoning production. Why? Well, we’ve seen this before. It’s the shale debt redux. Operators did it a few years ago in natural gas and prices have yet to recover. Unfortunately cheap money in the form of debt can mean poor investment choices for businesses and for investors. But it can also lead to an aberrant market because operators deep in debt won’t curtail production even though it is glutted. Debt coupons simply have to be met.

The shale revolution has always been funded by massive debt. Operators who were drilling for gas back in 2009-2011 used debt extensively. And just like now, they overproduced. By 2011, supply exceeded demand by four times. Then prices tanked. It is curious that so few asked the questions: why did they produce so heavily and glut the market; and why did they continue to produce into a glutted market? The answer is really quite simple. Many couldn’t afford to pull back production to help stabilize prices. Had they done so, they would not have been able to meet their debt payments. So they kept pumping…and pumping…and pumping.

And now they’ve done it again.

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

 

Global Shale Fail: Oil Majors Leaving Fracking Fields Across Europe, Asia

Global Shale Fail: Oil Majors Leaving Fracking Fields Across Europe, Asia

With some analysts predicting the global price of oil to see another drop, many oil majors have deployed their parachutes and jumped from thehydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) projects rapidly nose-diving across the world.

As The Wall Street Journal recently reported, the unconvetional shale oil and gas boom is still predominantly U.S.-centric, likely to remain so for years to come.

“Chevron Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC have packed up nearly all of their hydraulic fracturing wildcatting in Europe, Russia and China,” wrote The Wall Street Journal.

“Chevron halted its last European fracking operations in February when it pulled out of Romania. Shell said it is cutting world-wide shale spending by 30% in places including Turkey, Ukraine and Argentina. Exxon has pulled out of Poland and Hungary, and its German fracking operations are on hold.”

Though the fracking boom has taken off in the U.S. like no other place on Earth, theU.S. actually possesses less than 10 percent of the world’s estimated shale reserves, according to The Journal.

Despite this resource allotment discrepency, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) recently revealed that only four countries in the world have produced fracked oil or gas at a commercial-scale: the United States, Canada, China and Argentina.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Lipstick on a pig: America as the world’s swing producer of oil

Lipstick on a pig: America as the world’s swing producer of oil

Most people have heard the old saying: “You can put lipstick on a pig. But it’s still a pig.” That’s sort of what is happening in the American oil patch as producers try to put a positive gloss on the devastation that low oil prices are visiting on the industry.

Perhaps the most inventive redefinition is as follows: The part of the U.S. oil industry devoted to extracting tight oil from deep shale reservoirs in places such as North Dakota and Texas has made the United States the world’s “swing producer.” A swing producer is a country or territory that has large production in relation to the total market, substantial excess capacity and the ability to turn its capacity on and off quickly in response to market conditions.

The term makes the U.S. oil industry sound powerful and important. And, while the U.S. industry remains an important player in the world–third in production behind Russia and Saudi Arabia–it is most definitely not powerful in the sense that the moniker “swing producer” would imply.

To understand why this is so, we need only examine the history of the world’s other two swing producers. Prior to 1970, Texas was the world’s swing producer. Starting in the 1930s the state of Texas began regulating the amount of oil that an oil company could produce from its wells. It did this when overproduction drove the price of oil down to a mere 13 cents a barrel. (That’s not a typo.) No one was making any money. Well owners were then forced to abide by a system called “proration” in which each well was allowed to produce at a percentage of its capacity.

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

 

Rig Count Drops For 14th Week In A Row, Fastest Rate In 29 Years

Rig Count Drops For 14th Week In A Row, Fastest Rate In 29 Years

For the 14th week in a row, the US rig count fell 67 rigs to 1125, (a 5.6% drop to 41.4%, bigger than March 09’s previous record 14-week decline of 41%). The decline in rigs contionues to tyrack the lagged oil price perfectly but has shown absolutely no impact on production levels as firms push for cashflows in a race to the bottom. As one analyst rightly noted, while rig counts continue to drop, companies are high-grading (shifting to more efficient wells), “the real thing that needs to change is U.S. production and that is not happening at the moment.” April WTI Crude tested $45.01 before the data and bounced very modestly on the data.

  • *U.S. TOTAL RIG COUNT -67 TO 1,125, BAKER HUGHES SAYS
  • *U.S. OIL RIG COUNT -56 TO 866, BAKER HUGHES SAYS

The 14th weekly drop in a row continues to track the lagged oil price…

For an aggregate XX% plunge (the fastest plunge since 1986)

 

Rig counts drop but production rises…

*  *  *

Finally, as a reminder, here is Bloomberg to explain the ‘link’ between wells, production, and rigs…

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Texas: From Shale Boom To Water Revolution

Texas: From Shale Boom To Water Revolution

Texas is famous the world over for two things on a massive scale: oil and droughts. Now the slick but dry state is becoming famous for water: that precious element that both resolves the drought problem and also makes it possible to pump more oil out of the ground.

Not only does Texas have the Permian Basin and the Eagle Ford shale, but it also has the Gulf of Mexico and its massive oil deposits and endless gallons of seawater that are now economically treatable thanks to next generation water processing technology.

As NASA predicts a decades-long ‘mega drought’ later this century, next generation water processing technology coming from within the oil industry promises not only to help solve Texas’ drought problem by accessing and desalinating brackish and slightly salty water sources deep under the dry Texan surface, but to go one step further by desalinating ocean water and turning dirty water into potable water.

Related: Harold Hamm Dismisses IEA Shale Prediction

While conventional desalination technologies only recover about 35% of fresh water from a gallon of seawater, new Dutch technology brought to Texas by a local company recovers approximately 97% of the fresh water at an economical cost. At the same time, the new technology uses no chemicals, rendering it quite possibly the ‘greenest’ water processing technology in operation today.

This ushers in the ability to add new water sources to our current ecological system by desalinating brackish and ocean water that previously was not considered in the amount of fresh water available for human consumption.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

ExxonMobil CEO Wrong About “Resilience” Of Tight Oil Production

ExxonMobil CEO Wrong About “Resilience” Of Tight Oil Production

ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson is wrong about the resilience of U.S. tight oil production.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported:

“…Mr. Tillerson pointed out that the collapse in natural-gas prices similarly had led the number of rigs drilling for that fuel to drop to 280 from north of 1,600 in 2008. Gas output jumped 50% in that time, he said. That is what you call resilience…While he didn’t see a perfect parallel between shale gas and shale oil, he said there were “lessons” to be learned.”

His point is that we should not expect a big drop in U.S. tight oil production just because the rig count is falling. He bases this prediction on what happened with gas production in 2008-2009 and afterward. That is wrong.

The fact that gas production didn’t decrease much in 2008-2009 despite a huge drop in rig count is incorrectly attributed to the high productivity of shale gas wells. The truth is that shale gas wasn’t a big component of total gas production at that time.

Related: Rig Count Irrelevant As US Output Continues To Soar

Let’s look at the rig count drop in 2008-2009. The chart below shows the various components of U.S. gas production and the gas-directed rig count.

NatGasProd07-14

Natural gas production components and gas-directed rig count, 2007-2014.

Source: Baker Hughes, EIA, DrillingInfo and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.
(click image to enlarge)

The gas rig count fell from 1,601 in September 2008 to 675 by July 2009. By September 2009, gas production had decreased about 4.5 Bcf per day (4.5% of total). Shale gas only amounted to 12% of total gas supply at that time.

 

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Get Ready for Oil Deals: Shale Is Going on Sale

Get Ready for Oil Deals: Shale Is Going on Sale

(Bloomberg) — A decision by Whiting Petroleum Corp., the largest producer in North Dakota’s Bakken shale basin, to put itself up for sale looks to be the first tremor in a potential wave of consolidation as $50-a-barrel prices undercut companies with heavy debt and high costs.

For the first time since wildcatters such as Harold Hamm of Continental Resources Inc. began extracting significant amounts of oil from shale formations, acquisition prospects from Texas to the Great Plains are looking less expensive.

Buyers are ultimately after reserves, the amount of oil a company has in the ground based on its drilling acreage. The value of about 75 shale-focused U.S. producers based on their reserves fell by a median of 25 percent by the end of 2014 compared to 2013, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s opening up new opportunities for bigger companies with a better handle on their debt, said William Arnold, a former executive at Royal Dutch Shell Plc.

“In this market, there are whales and there are fishes, and the whales are well armed,” said Arnold, who also worked as an energy-industry banker and now teaches at Rice University in Houston. “There are some very vulnerable little fishes out there trying to survive any way they can.”

Smaller producers with significant debt that depend on higher prices to make money are the most likely early targets for buyers such as Exxon Mobil Corp. or Chevron Corp., companies that have bided their time for years as the value of some shale fields soared to $38,000 an acre from $450 just a few years earlier.

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

 

Olduvai IV: Courage
Click on image to read excerpts

Olduvai II: Exodus
Click on image to purchase

Click on image to purchase @ FriesenPress