Home » Posts tagged 'stages of grieving'

Tag Archives: stages of grieving

Olduvai
Click on image to purchase

Olduvai III: Catacylsm
Click on image to purchase

Post categories

Post Archives by Category

Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh CCXIII–Keep Calm and Carry On…Human Ingenuity and Technology Will Save Us! Part 1

Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh CCXIII–Keep Calm and Carry On…Human Ingenuity and Technology Will Save Us! Part 1

Human cognition and the many psychological mechanisms that impact our species’ comprehension, emotions, and beliefs about the world are fascinating subjects, as is epistemology (aka the ‘theory of knowledge’).

Despite being mostly enthralled with biology during my late high school education and physiology during my early university years, I wandered into studying psychology for a couple of years while pursuing my second bachelor’s degree before becoming more interested in human evolution and completing a Master of Arts degree in anthropology/archaeology. 

It was the use of Stephen Jay Gould’s Ever Since Darwin text in an introductory psychology course that sparked my interest in human physical evolution and then a chance meeting with one of the university’s senior archaeologists to help advise on course selection within the anthropology department which steered me into that field and an eventual graduate degree that focussed on North American archaeology (working on a variety of pre/historic sites in Ontario, Canada, and Oaxaca, Mexico). 

I read up on epistemology mostly on my own as a side interest while studying archaeology being exposed to some very interesting aspects in introductory psychology and anthropology courses (particularly philology and hermeneutics), and then also auditing a senior philosophy course on archaeological theory–little of which I understood having none of the fundamental background knowledge; I don’t know what the hell I was thinking by enrolling in it. (See: Decline of ‘Rationality’. Website     Medium     Substack)


A handful of my Contemplations that discuss human psychology:
Despite Warnings We Have Continued Business-As-Usual and Doubled-Down On Our Avoidance Behaviours. Website     Medium     Substack
Avoiding ‘Collapse’ Awareness. Website     Medium     Substack
Reality is an Inconvenience to Beliefs. Website      Medium     Substack
Most People Don’t Want Their Illusions Destroyed. Website     Medium     Substack
Carbon Tunnel Vision And Resource/Energy & Ecological Blindness, Part 1, Website     Medium     Substack Part 2, Website     Medium     Substack Part 3. Website     Medium     Substack
Cognition and Belief Systems in a ‘Collapsing’ World: Part One, Website     Medium     Substack Part Two–Deference to Authority, Website     Medium     Substack Part Three–Groupthink, Website     Medium     Substack Part Four–Cognitive Dissonance, Website     Medium     Substack Part Five–Justification Hypothesis, Website     Medium     Substack Part Six–Sociopolitical ‘Collapse’ and Ecological Overshoot, Website     Medium     Substack


Yes, I spent the entire 1980s in three universities (Western, McMaster, Brock) chasing a number of degrees, settling into a career in education by the end of the decade–it’s where the jobs were at the time  (and this hot girl I had met was interested in that profession). Thankfully my hometown had a university, so I did not have to pay for room and board for most of the first two degrees (I got married during the second one and we moved into the university’s married-students residence that was very reasonably priced, with rent being based upon income. With both of us being students, the rent was relatively low reflecting our income–we celebrate our 40th anniversary next summer). 

I had a relatively good-paying job working part-time in a grocery store so I was able to pay for much of this self-indulgence, working 20-24 hours a week on top of my classes (although I did accumulate some student loans along the way as well that I paid off quickly after graduating–interest rates were about 14% at the time that I had to start repaying them–with the help of working part-time in The Beer Store on top of my working full time as a classroom teacher). Thank the stars for youthful energy, especially those 4 months or so early in my university days that I spent working full-time from 10 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. stocking shelves before heading home for a quick shower and then off to the university for my physiology classes that began at 8:30 a.m.–typically sleeping from about 2-3 p.m., until 9 p.m..

Anyways, I raise this fascination with psychology because as humanity’s large, complex societies continue their journey along the Seneca Cliff of ‘collapse’, one should expect not only a considerable increase in the symptoms that signal societal decline/simplification, but more importantly from a human psychological perspective a significant and concomitant shift in the beliefs and human responses (emotional and behavioural) that accompany the increased tension that arises from the ecological and societal deterioration that is occurring and becoming more obvious and difficult, if not impossible, to ignore. 

Humans are, if nothing else, a highly ‘intelligent’ species engaged in enormously complex thinking and behaviours to reduce/avoid our anxiety/stress (pain) and increase our optimism/positive ‘vibes’ (pleasure). And, given our story-telling nature, we often do this via the tales we tell ourselves and others, with these stories influencing every aspect of our cognition, beliefs, emotions, and actions–and not always in a positively adaptive manner.

Oftentimes, it would appear, we employ maladaptive strategies but believe they are helpful and create a variety of narratives to support and defend them–even if there is overwhelming evidence that they are ill-informed, quite flawed, and in many cases defy biological processes, geological limitations, and physical laws. And we are, unfortunately, helped along these ‘destructive’ pathways by members of our own species who leverage perceived crises and our fear and anxiety about them to expand their personal wealth and power. [Note: I am using ‘we’, ‘our’, ‘us’ as a generalisation throughout this writing.]


A handful of my Contemplations that touch on how crises are leveraged against us:
Rackets: Keeping the Curtains on Reality Drawn. Website     Medium     Substack
Energy and Its Interconnections With Our Financialised Economic System. Website     Medium     Substack
Fiat Currency Devaluation: A Ruling Elite ‘Solution’ to Growth Limits. Website     Medium     Substack
Rackets: Keeping the Curtains on Reality Drawn. Website     Medium     Substack
Ruling Elite Rackets Everywhere….. Website     Medium     Substack


Societal Decline and Concomitant Stressors

In his 1988 monograph The Collapse of Complex Societies archaeologist Joseph Tainter argued that human societies at their core are problem-solving organisations and that they increase in  complexity through ever-increasing investments in problem-solving. This approach, however, eventually reaches a point when marginal productivity and effectiveness of the ‘solutions’ being pursued can no longer rise–complexity can still accrue some benefits past this point, but at a declining marginal rate

As the ‘solutions’ pursued begin to lose their efficacy and perceived issues go unresolved, societal stress begins to grow–this is primarily due to our tendency to use the easiest-to-achieve and least-expensive-to-implement ‘solutions’ first, leaving the more difficult and expensive approaches until later in our problem-solving approach–i.e., we pick the lowest hanging fruit to begin then move to the ones that require more ‘investments’, especially in terms of resources (particularly energy).

Add to this growing strain that many, if not all, of the ‘solutions’ we pursue tend to lead to larger and more convoluted ‘problems’ down the road due to expanding complexity, nonlinear feedback, and unforeseen complications/consequences. This increases societal stressors as time goes by and requires more and more problem-solving efforts and investments, sometimes to a point where the ‘costs’ outweigh the ‘benefits’. A positive feedback loop emerges that is difficult if not impossible to escape from (See: Problem Solving: Complexity, History, Sustainability. Website     Medium      Substack). [Note: I put ‘problem’ and ‘solutions’ in quotes as much of what we are dealing with are not ‘problems’ but predicaments that have no solutions, only outcomes—see Erik Michaels’ writing on this important clarification—particularly when we are dealing with the stresses related to ecological overshoot and all of its symptom predicaments.]

Tainter goes on to suggest that today’s rising “concern with collapse and self-sufficiency may itself be a significant social indicator, the expectable scanning behaviour of a social system under stress, in which there is an advantage to seeking lower-cost solutions” (p. 210). 

This scanning behaviour Tainter is speaking of refers to the expansion of general awareness and associated assessments that a social system employs when it senses challenges or stressors. It reflects how a society measures its environment in order to find adaptive strategies (proactive and reactive ‘problem solving’) that support and sometimes enhance survival. The hope is that vulnerabilities can be identified and crises anticipated by monitoring change, gathering relevant information, and adopting strategies that can address the pending or occurring issues. But more often than not, I would argue, we are being reactive in our problem-solving behaviour as opposed to proactive; however, either approach tends to result in greater complexity and additional ‘problems’ to ‘solve’.

To sum up this scanning behaviour and what arises from it: when the social and physical environments that we exist within begin to exhibit significant stress, humans increasingly notice and begin to look for ways in which that stress can be relieved. This stress relief is usually via some form of ‘problem solving’ investment. There is a good argument to be made to suggest that this is a classic ‘fight-or-flight’ response to alleviate anxiety/avoid pain. 

What are some of the more obvious stressors that seem to be rising to the surface of societal awareness? I’ve listed some in the following table and how they seem to manifest themselves.


These stressors seem to be exploding across nations and the globe, an indication of our global, industrial societies experiencing systemic strain and declining resilience. Such change significantly increases the potential for societal ‘collapse’; it doesn’t guarantee it, it simply sets up a society for a stress surge that cannot be addressed and pushes it past a tipping point. (See: Collapse = Prolonged Period of Diminishing Returns + Significant Stress Surge(s) Part 1, Website    Medium    Substack Part 2, Website    Medium    Substack Part 3, Website     Medium     Substack Part 4, Website     Medium     Substack)

Depending upon one’s perspective, the cause of these stressors varies widely. Most tend to be somewhat reductionist in their evaluation leading to the pointing of fingers at individual determinants, especially at the political and/or economic systems. And while these certainly play a not non-significant role, the vast majority of this thinking neglects the complexity of systems and especially the biogeophysical aspects that I would argue underpin the increasing stress our globalised, industrial societies are experiencing; especially biological processes (e.g., ecological overshoot), geological constraints (e.g., finite resource limitations), and physical laws (e.g., thermodynamic, especially entropy). 

It is rare indeed that there is any consideration or discussion regarding the notion that many if not all of the predicaments we are facing are the result of humanity having bumped up against and are now experiencing the consequences of ecological overshoot as laid out by Meadows et al in their 1972 text, The Limits to Growth, and William Catton Jr. in his 1980 monograph, Overshoot:The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change

For the most part, what one must not do is challenge the ideas of economic growth and its associated ‘progress’ for they are the dominant and preferred mindsets within the modern zeitgeist, and must be maintained regardless of the ‘costs’. 

Human Psychological Responses To Stressors

Regardless of the causes of these stressors, the responses by our species to them vary rather widely with much depending upon sociocultural context, community dynamics, available resources, and personal circumstances. And while some may simply seek more information about what is occurring, others pursue more actionable pathways–such as adapting behavioural changes that can steer individuals and/or communities towards ‘sustainable’ practices and self-sufficiency, relocating/migrating from a ‘failing’ region/nation, or engaging on a sociopolitical level–it is the psychological reactions that I am focussing upon in this Contemplation.

The psychological repercussions of growing societal stressors are exceedingly complex and also quite varied. Some people handle stress much better than others, with much depending upon personal experiences and personality traits, but also sociocultural norms and expectations. 

The tendency of some in the face of growing societal stress is to lay the blame at the feet of others and we see this in the rise of othering alongside both domestic and geopolitical strife. Some actually take a diametrically-opposite path with attempts to form altruistic networks and organisations to support individuals and communities. 

Still others don’t even acknowledge these stressors, wondering what all the fuss is about. James Howard Kunstler has argued that many, perhaps most, are simply too caught up in the ‘thrum of daily life’ and personal/family stress that takes precedence over concerns about societal-level stressors (I often think about the ‘privilege’ I have in being able to contemplate and then pontificate about in my writing these issues and topics in light of some of the tragedies and situations others in this world are experiencing on an almost daily basis–some not small number of people are struggling to avoid sectarian violence, survive the next bombing run, put food on the table, and/or pay for or find shelter). 

Additionally, I wouldn’t be surprised if part of this ‘lack of interest’ is due to the large number of individuals in our ‘modern’ societies being medicated for anxiety/depression–a personal communication from one of our local pharmacists a couple of years ago caused me to pause when he declared that he guessed a good half of our town’s adult residents were on anti-anxiety/-depressant medication; likely exaggerated, but still… 

And then, of course, there are all the distractions that the ruling elite help to maintain–the Roman ‘bread and circuses’; ‘modernity’s’ version being found mostly in the entertainment industry (think musical performances, video games, theme parks, film and television production, sports, etc.). 

While fear and anxiety about external stressors can overwhelm some, perhaps the most common reactions are reflective of the grieving stages (much of the above few paragraphs on responses can be categorised into these). When societies experience stress, it is common to have to confront loss and significant change, and the stages of grieving are a reflexive response to this as they help to alleviate anxiety-provoking thoughts and fear.


The defence mechanism of denial is one of the initial ones employed when confronting stress. It is the refusal to accept the reality that one is experiencing. It is oftentimes a temporary coping strategy to help protect oneself from overwhelming emotions. If the issue doesn’t exist, neither does the emotional torment. Problem solved. 

However, in the context of a failing society, this reaction can lead to more problematic outcomes since it delays actions that might help to reduce the negative consequences that accompany ecological overshoot and societal simplification. Denial often results in the belief that things are not nearly as bad as portrayed by some and that stability will reassert itself soon enough even in the face of evidence to the contrary. 

And then there’s the bargaining stage. 

At this point in our global, industrial society’s ‘collapse’ I am witnessing a significant rise in this particular phase of grieving–it could just be my confirmation bias (I’ve noted it and now I see it everywhere). It would seem that more and more people are moving past the denial stage–more-or-less acknowledging that there are growing signs of societal and ecological stress–and into that of attempting to negotiate themselves and/or society’s way out of the situation to avoid the associated anxiety and loss. 

Oftentimes, the bargaining by way of seeking ‘solutions’ is aimed at sustaining current living arrangements with as little inconvenience as is possible. Many appeal to our politicians and political institutions (naively, in my opinion, believing the decision makers in these systems  actually have the best interests of the masses at the top of their agendas). Others put their faith in the ‘free market’ and corporate ‘leaders’ (believing that ‘rational’ choices by consumers and human innovation will lead us to the promised land). And some turn to society’s ‘experts’ and academics, having placed ‘science’ on a pedestal that is ‘objective’, definitive in its conclusions, and capable of ‘solving’ all ‘problems’ given enough time and resources (not appreciating the impossibility of our species to have complete objectivity, the influence that paradigms and incentives have on steering a lot of research, and the leveraging of this approach by various profiteers–including our political class).


A handful of my Contemplations that discusses these appeals to authority:
The Politics of Dancing: The politicians are now dj’s…. Website     Medium     Substack
She Blinded Me With Science, and More On The ‘Clean’ Energy Debate…. Website     Medium     Substack
Solace Will Not Be Found Within Our Sociopolitical Systems—Biogeophysical Limitations Cannot Be Overcome By Way Of Policy. Website     Medium     Substack
Our Political Systems Are Not Going To Help Our Predicament As They Want/Need Growth. Medium     Substack
Sociopolitical Agency, Narrative Control, and Collapse. Medium     Substack


Being who we are–a story-telling ape with the ability to devise and construct various complex tools–we are tending to gravitate towards utopian tales of unending progress and ‘relevant’ technologies in our attempts to ‘solve’ and/or mitigate the array of societal and ecological stressors. Most of the technologies we are employing tend to be ‘quick fixes’, the lower-hanging fruit of ‘solutions’. On top of this many are spreading fantastical tales through their support of prototypes or conceptual/as-yet-to-be-hatched technologies that will ‘save’ humanity and the planet–all of them quite magical in their ability to be ‘clean and sustainable’.


Unfortunately, this problem-solving approach that humanity tends to use ignores both the complexity and deeper structural aspects of the issues we are facing. And more often than not, we have been drawn towards the idea that technological fixes in particular are sufficient to prevent, address, or reverse precarious situations. Because, after all, technology is always ‘progressing’ as it’s always getting better (‘new and improved’), and human ingenuity guarantees this forever and ever. Amen!

This stage of grieving that strives to confront loss and change also aims to maintain/regain a sense of agency in our lives and societies. In trying to retain a sense of power over our lives, quick-fix solutions are quite appealing. We often don’t care if they are getting to the root of the issue or not. Does it provide, even temporarily, immediate relief from the stress/anxiety being experienced? Yes? Then let’s do it and to hell with the fallout or we will deal with it, if any, down the road. And since we’re such an intelligent species, we will ‘solve’ such repercussions…eventually. 

This is guaranteed because it’s always worked in the past–only it hasn’t. 

In Part 2, I will explore this human ingenuity and technological prowess aspect further and its use to bargain our way out of societal and ecological collapse. And what prompted me to write this Contemplation.


What is going to be my standard WARNING/ADVICE going forward and that I have reiterated in various ways before this:

“Only time will tell how this all unfolds but there’s nothing wrong with preparing for the worst by ‘collapsing now to avoid the rush’ and pursuing self-sufficiency. By this I mean removing as many dependencies on the Matrix as is possible and making do, locally. And if one can do this without negative impacts upon our fragile ecosystems or do so while creating more resilient ecosystems, all the better. 

Building community (maybe even just household) resilience to as high a level as possible seems prudent given the uncertainties of an unpredictable future. There’s no guarantee it will ensure ‘recovery’ after a significant societal stressor/shock but it should increase the probability of it and that, perhaps, is all we can ‘hope’ for from its pursuit.”If you have arrived here and get something out of my writing, please consider ordering the trilogy of my ‘fictional’ novel series, Olduvai (PDF files; only $9.99 Canadian), via my website or the link below — the ‘profits’ of which help me to keep my internet presence alive and first book available in print (and is available via various online retailers).


Attempting a new payment system as I am contemplating shutting down my site in the future (given the ever-increasing costs to keep it running). 

If you are interested in purchasing any of the 3 books individually or the trilogy, please try the link below indicating which book(s) you are purchasing. 

Costs (Canadian dollars):
Book 1: $2.99
Book 2: $3.89
Book 3: $3.89
Trilogy: $9.99

Feel free to throw in a ‘tip’ on top of the base cost if you wish; perhaps by paying in U.S. dollars instead of Canadian. Every few cents/dollars helps… 

https://paypal.me/olduvaitrilogy?country.x=CA&locale.x=en_US 

If you do not hear from me within 48 hours or you are having trouble with the system, please email me: olduvaitrilogy@gmail.com.

You can also find a variety of resources, particularly my summary notes for a handful of texts, especially William Catton’s Overshoot and Joseph Tainter’s Collapse of Complex Societies: see here.

 

Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh C–Grieving: A Natural Response To Recognition Of Growth Limits


Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh C

February 11, 2023 (original posting date)

Monte Alban, Mexico. (1988) Photo by author.

Grieving: A Natural Response To Recognition Of Growth Limits

Denial, anger, bargaining, and depression in the face of grievous reality is everywhere; and we all do it to some extent. Some move through the stages more quickly while others remain bogged down in one or more. And it’s not uncommon to bounce back and forth between different stages.

We don’t want to accept the unpalatable, particularly our (and society’s) mortality. Grappling with such thoughts can be debilitating, both physically and psychologically. I know my first few years of reflecting upon our various predicaments as I travelled down the rabbit’s hole that is Peak Oil was most difficult. My anxiety was, at times, through the roof; but being who I am much of that was channelled into physical activities, particularly constructing some elaborate food gardens.

Psychologists are fairly certain that moving to the final stage of grieving — acceptance — and engaging with reality in a more forthright manner (even when it is not what we wish or want) allows one to deal with the emotions in a way that helps us to validate them in a healthier way. But this is so difficult to do when we are grieving. Extremely difficult.

Accepting, for example, that our complex society and its relatively high living standards (thanks primarily to our leveraging of a one-time cache of photosynthetic-created energy) have an expiration date is a contemplation the vast, vast majority of us do not want to consider. We desperately fight to keep the negative thoughts out of our minds, thereby impacting the belief systems through which we interpret the world — its past, present, and future.

In a world that has experienced significant problem-solving success due to our tool-making abilities and this finite supply of dense and transportable energy reserves, it’s exceedingly difficult to imagine this trend of ‘progress’ is coming to an end. We subsequently weave a variety of comforting narratives to avoid such a disheartening reality.

“Complex technologies and human ingenuity will save us from any problem we encounter, including (place your favourite one here)” is one common narrative…except inductive reasoning/logic of this nature does not always work. Continual observations by the turkey of the farmer have provided nothing but overwhelming evidence and positive reinforcement that the farmer is a beneficent and thoughtful caregiver; right up until the day before Thanksgiving and the trip behind the barn to the killing cone, knife in hand.

Confronting the blinders imposed upon us by these comforting narratives allows us to view our world and reality differently, and very much more accurately in my opinion. Not perfectly, but more reflective of the limits existence upon a finite world brings to a biological species not very much different from all the others on this planet — except perhaps for its tool-making skills and denial of reality.

Alas very, very few want to do this. We would rather remain comfortable in our beliefs that humanity is not limited by its physical environment and stands outside Nature. To paraphrase Nietzsche: we don’t want exposure to reality because that destroys our illusions.

One such illusion among others that I’ve confronted recently is the belief that growth (be in economic or population) is not only inevitable but purely beneficial. It has been driving a significant construction ‘boom’ in my province and more specifically my town for a number of years. I’ve written about this before but I continue to see some rather misguided but quite common beliefs dominating the discussion among locals.

The following thoughts are what bubbled up in my mind as I reflected upon these conversations and what the significant majority of my fellow Ontarians appear to believe.


We need to reject the mythos that growth (especially economic but also population) is always and forever a good/beneficial policy path. It is not. Not only are the very real negative environmental/ecological consequences ignored or rationalized away in such a story, but the limits of what is possible and social problems that arise from it mostly discounted/minimized.

In addition, the tendency to assume such growth is inevitable completely overlooks the fact that it is a sociopolitical/socioeconomic policy choice, not a predestined path. We can stop or reverse it if we so choose.

Finally, little if any attention is paid to the reason(s) our ruling elite cheerlead growth. It is not for the virtue-signalling reasons they shout and market repeatedly. It is about sustaining a Ponzi-type economic system that supports status quo power and wealth structures. It is profit and prestige motivated. It must always be remembered that the primary motivation of our ruling caste is the control/expansion of the wealth-generating/-extracting systems that provide their revenue streams and thus positions of power and prestige. All other considerations are secondary/tertiary and ultimately are leveraged to meet their primary one.

The world is a complex nexus of geography, geology, biology, physics, and chemistry. And the stories told by our ‘leaders’ mostly ignore (or rationalize away) the physical realities of these fundamental sciences in favour of sociocultural myths that reinforce the idea that humans stand outside Nature — and their positions in our societies.


Significantly exponential credit-/debt-based fiat currency growth (thanks to the private financial institutions creating it from thin air and charging interest for its use in order to garner obscene profits, and which is what is feeding all this) collides catastrophically with the realities of existence upon a finite planet and its physical limits.

Given interest-bearing fiat is a claim/lien upon future resources — that we have encountered significant diminishing returns upon — and that we are several quadrillion dollars already in hawk, the writing is on the wall that we are totally and completely fubar. What is unsustainable cannot be sustained; no matter how much money we create. All we are succeeding in doing is stealing resources from the future and ensuring our planetary sinks are beyond repair.

The best option left is to prepare locally for the impending breakdown of the various complex systems that we have grown dependent upon, particularly the procurement of potable water, food production, and regional shelter needs. In addition, we should be degrowing our regions/communities, not making the situation even more dire and compounding its effects by continuing to chase growth — no matter what the profiteers from this perpetual-growth strategy are repeatedly telling us.


What I did say on one of the FB posts to try and keep it relatively succinct and simple:

Infinite growth on a planet with finite resources already encountering diminishing returns and using trillions of dollars of debt-/credit-based ‘money’ to pull them from the future. What could possibly go wrong? We are travelling in exactly the opposite direction of where we should be heading.


If you’ve made it to the end of this contemplation and have got something out of my writing, please consider ordering the trilogy of my ‘fictional’ novel series, Olduvai (PDF files; only $9.99 Canadian), via my website — the ‘profits’ of which help me to keep my internet presence alive and first book available in print (and is available via various online retailers). Encouraging others to read my work is also much appreciated.

Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh XXIII–‘Clean Energy’ and the Stages of Grieving

Today’s Contemplation: Collapse Cometh XXIII

Tulum, Mexico (1986) Photo by author

‘Clean Energy’ and the Stages of Grieving

Today’s thought was motivated by another Tyee article that carries on the notion of ‘clean energy’ and the ‘magical thinking’ needed to buy into such narratives.


As long as language is being manipulated (e.g., ‘clean energy’ is a gargantuan oxymoron), magical thinking employed (e.g., ‘green hydrogen’ or some iteration of it has been on the books for 2+ centuries and is still far, far away, if ever, given the physical and economic hurdles/roadblocks), and fundamental causes of our dilemmas conveniently ignored (e.g., our pursuit of the infinite growth chalice on a finite planet), the ‘solutions’ we so desperately seek will always elude us (if they even exist).

Despite relatively general recognition of humanity’s impending ‘challenges’, we continue to follow the ‘Business-As-Usual’ (BAU) scenario painted for us by Meadows et al. in their 1972 Limits to Growth. Our ‘leaders’ talk a good talk but the reality (given the obvious lack of ‘progress’ in mitigating our issues and their increasingly probable negative consequences) is that we have painted ourselves into a corner from which we apparently cannot extricate ourselves (except through some very convoluted narrative creations).

There is overwhelming and increasing evidence that there is a significant reckoning in terms of energy decline (and various other resources) in our future, regardless of our wishes, ingenuity, and technology. The complexities of our globalised, just-in-time, and highly resource-dependent industrialised societies are losing their support systems in terms of the resources they require. We have encountered significant diminishing returns on our investments and can no longer ‘afford’ them. All the talk of ‘solutions’ is, at this point, seemingly reflective of the first four stages of grief outlined by Kubler-Ross: denial, anger, bargaining, and depression.

We are very keen on avoiding the final acceptance stage. Instead, we listen and accept faulty narratives about how this will all work out just fine. We create and propagate misleading phrases like ‘clean energy’ and ‘net zero emissions’ which are primarily marketing slogans. We allow ourselves to believe in ‘promising’ technological ‘fixes’ that require us to ignore or dismiss the constraints and physical impossibilities that are involved. And perhaps the worst of all, we look the other way when our ‘leadership’ completely ‘jumps the shark’ and whispers in our ears that we indeed can pursue ‘sustainable growth’ (a phrase that totally twists the concept of sustainability and ignores the biophysical constraints of a finite planet) and live, for the most part, happily-ever-after.

Such a fairy tale ending is indeed possible, but only in our imaginations. The momentum of our complex systems and the reality of a finite world straining under the exploitation of cognitively ‘advanced’ walking-talking apes are taking us down a path that is best described by William Catton Jr. in Overshoot: a species that overshoots its environmental carrying capacity is destined to encounter a population ‘collapse’ and any response that increases the drawdown of the fundamental resources upon which the species is reliant only speeds up the process. And this seems very much to be exactly what we are doing as we ‘debate’ ways in which to sustain our living standards and most of our energy-reliant and -intensive sociocultural practices.

Our best option may be to, in the words of author and social commentator John Michael Greer, “Collapse Now and Avoid the Rush”. Degrowth is coming. We can have some say in how this occurs but the longer we delay (and we’re very, very good at delaying our encounters with ‘reality’), the less ‘control’ we will have in meeting the coming challenges.

My suggestion is to detach from the ‘Matrix’ as much as possible by relocalising production of necessary goods but particularly shelter needs and organic and regenerative food production, and ensure the procurement of potable water. The government/politicians/ruling elite are not coming to the rescue; that is not their primary concern despite everything they say. The way in which they have met these challenges (that have been known for a number of decades) is evidence of that. We have continued to follow the BAU path set out in 1972 and simply managed to put ourselves further and further behind the eight ball. It’s perhaps no exaggeration to suggest that the planet burns while our ‘leaders’ are fiddling. Rely on yourself, family, and like-minded community members; not some politician promising more of the same actions that brought us to where we are.

Olduvai IV: Courage
Click on image to read excerpts

Olduvai II: Exodus
Click on image to purchase

Click on image to purchase @ FriesenPress