Home » Posts tagged 'john howard'

Tag Archives: john howard

Olduvai
Click on image to purchase

Olduvai III: Catacylsm
Click on image to purchase

Post categories

Post Archives by Category

Former Prime Minister Howard assumes US shale oil will provide for China’s oil demand growth

Former Prime Minister Howard assumes US shale oil will provide for China’s oil demand growth

Australia in Today’s World – some observations from former PM John Howard
https://aiiansw.tidyhq.com/public/schedule/events/16630-australia-in-today-s-world-some-observations-from-former-pm-john-howard

John Howard was happy to report that Chinese GDP growth is 6% and that a great future lies ahead for Australia.

In Q&A I asked him:

“Are you aware that Chinese oil production peaked in 2015? Therefore China is now where the US was in 1970 when US production peaked. That was followed by the Nixon shock in which the US cancelled the convertibility of the US$ to gold. In 2016, China’s oil demand growth was around half a million barrels per day. Multiply this by 10 years and where will 5 mb/d come from?”

Here are a couple of graphs which highlight the situation:

China_crude_production_2002-Jul2017_JODIFig 1: China’s oil production

China_demand_by_product_2015-Sep17_IEA-OMR

Fig 2: China’s oil demand by fuel

Note that only 24% of fuels (and 18% of growth) is petrol which means electric cars won’t help much.

Asia_oil_production_consumption_2005-2016_fill_in-2036

Fig 3: Asia Pacific oil production vs consumption

The above is my favorite graph to show that there cannot be perpetual growth in the “Asian Century”

Howard’s answer:

“I was never asked this question….from US shale oil I guess”

Let’s have a look at the US crude oil projections from the Energy Information Administration done in January 2017:

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

This Veteran Climate Scientist Advised Three Australian Prime Ministers. What Would He Say To Tony Abbott?

Scientist Dr Graeme Pearman knows more than most about the responsibilities and the perils that come with communicating climate change to the highest authorities.

As one of Australia’s highest ranking government scientists, he was asked into the offices of three consecutive Australian Prime Ministers to brief them on climate change.

In the late 1980s, it was Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke. Then in the 1990s, it was Hawke’s Labor successor Paul Keating. As the decade wore on, it was the conservative Liberal Prime Minister John Howard on the other side of the briefing table.

Pearman was a senior scientist in the Atmospheric Research division of theCSIRO – the nation’s top government science and research organisation.

As well as liaising with political heavyweights, Pearman gave hundreds of briefings to other agencies and organisations in the public and private sector.

My profile I think grew from a broad view of both the climate science but also the potential consequences. I also held strong views that as a public servant I had a responsibility to publicise scientific findings of wider potential relevance.

My relatively senior role in CSIRO – which ultimately was my downfall – provided me with a platform perhaps less available to others.

Pearman is no longer at the CSIRO. He ended his 33-year stint with the agency in 2004 — resigning after a period when, he has said, he was being internally censored over his views on climate change.

So what would he tell the current Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, if he ever were asked into that particular Canberra office (he hasn’t been, so far).

My suggestions would be, listen to real experts, scientists, economists and engineers, and Academies about options; listen to the real trend occurring overseas in particularly with respect to energy sourcing and application options; look beyond the term of the current Government and think strategically; see this as an opportunity rather than a negative.

Earlier this month the Abbott Government announced the greenhouse gas reduction target it would take to the major United Nations COP21 climate talks in Paris in December. The target to cut emissions between 26 and 28 per cent by 2030 from 2005 levels has been roundly criticised for lacking ambition.

 

Olduvai IV: Courage
Click on image to read excerpts

Olduvai II: Exodus
Click on image to purchase

Click on image to purchase @ FriesenPress