Home » Posts tagged 'data trek research'

Tag Archives: data trek research

Olduvai
Click on image to purchase

Olduvai III: Catacylsm
Click on image to purchase

Post categories

Post Archives by Category

“Inflation Is Inevitably Going To Rise” – Is Alan Greenspan Right?

“Inflation Is Inevitably Going To Rise” – Is Alan Greenspan Right?

Via DataTrekResearch.com,

“Right now, there’s no real inflation at play. But if we go further than we are currently, inflation is inevitably going to rise.” That’s from Alan Greenspan on CNBC this week. The “further” relates to US Federal deficit spending, the idea being that +$1 trillion annual budget shortfalls will eventually trigger price inflation.

It isn’t just Greenspan that is worried about rising US consumer price inflation; as we read through the most bearish market commentaries for 2020 this concern often has pride of place. Easy monetary and fiscal policy combined with a reaccelerating US/global economy late in a cycle is THE playbook for rising prices, so fair enough. The counterarguments are more structural (aging demographics, Internet price discovery, etc.), and while those work over the long term we can’t lean on them too hard in any given year. So do the inflation hawks have a case to make about 2020?

You know our methods for evaluating questions like this – a combination of market-based expectations and historical/real time data – so let’s get right to it:

#1: Expected 10-year inflation expectations imbedded in Treasury Inflation Protected bonds (TIPS spreads):

  • Even during the period of Federal Reserve bond buying, TIPS spreads were reasonable proxies for market expectations about long-run future inflation. The lowest they ever got was 1.2% in early 2016 and they have often been +2.0% over the last decade, the Fed’s notional target (see chart below).
  • TIPS spreads were +2.0% for almost all of 2018, for example, only dropping in November along with US/global growth expectations.
  • Expected 10-year forward inflation as measured by the TIPS market hasn’t touched 2.0% in 2019 and currently sits at 1.73%.

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Of Stocks & SCOTUS: The Perils Of Memory

Authored by Nicholas Colas via DataTrekResearch.com,

We have been thinking a lot about human memory over the last few days. Part of that is some lingering thought about the 10-year Lehman bankruptcy anniversary earlier this month. Another is the fact that Monday will be the one-year mark for DataTrek publishing these notes. And, of course, the Supreme Court nomination hearings today put human memory in a starring role.

The science of memory shows this subject is much more complex than most of us realize. One classic example:

  • Daniel Kahneman, who won a Nobel Prize for Prospect Theory, once did an experiment with subjects who were undergoing a colonoscopy.
  • Some patients received the standard exam, which featured an especially painful part near the end of the procedure. This is one reason colonoscopies had a bad rap for so long.
  • Others had their procedure altered so the last part was not so painful.
  • The latter remembered the whole event as being much less painful than those where the last bits were especially difficult. Same procedure, but entirely different memories based on whether the last slice of time was easy or hard.
  • As an aside, we’ve watched Kahneman’s TED talk more times than we can remember. It is worth a look if you haven’t seen it.

The researcher we follow most closely on the topic of memory is American academic Elizabeth Loftus of UC Irvine. One of her specialties is how eyewitness testimony in criminal cases can be incorrect, leading to false convictions. The crossover to the stresses of investing and how those affect our memories is what drew us first to her work. Here is a sample:

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

What Really Makes A Bubble

Via DataTrekResearch.com,

If I could strike one word from Wall Street’s dictionary, it would be “Bubble”. It is too often used in place of actual research and now seems to simply denote any asset that rises quickly in value, gets broader attention, and then rises some more. Even worse, since the Financial Crisis the word only seems more popular. Calling bubbles has reached its own bubble…

But since the word’s usage in finance is too entrenched to wipe it away, we should at least differentiate between systemically harmful bubbles and simple curiosities. For example:

  • Harmful: the NASDAQ bubble in 1999/2000 caused $2 trillion of value destruction when it burst in late 2000 – 2002. It had a hand in slowing US growth and damaged a whole generation of investors’ confidence in equity markets.
  • Nearly deadly: the 2007 US housing bubble set up the Financial Crisis and Great Recession, with global effects running to the tens of trillions of dollars.
  • Curiosity: by contrast, this year’s bursting of the crypto currency bubble was much less meaningful both in terms of size ($620 billion lost from January 7th peak to now) and impact on the broader global economy (essentially zero).
  • Curiosity: legal marijuana stocks – the latest group stuck with the “bubble” moniker, are even smaller than crypto currencies. The largest one by market cap – Canopy Growth – has a market cap of $15 billion. Tilray’s market cap is $13.5 billion. Aurora Cannabis’ market cap is $9.0 billion, and Cronos Group is $2.4 billion.

    If they all got cut in half tomorrow, it wouldn’t matter to anyone other than current holders.

To our thinking, the more interesting question about bubbles is “Why do they form in the first place and how can I be early in finding them?” As far as we can see, every investment mania of the modern era is the same and has varying degrees of these 5 features:

…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…

Olduvai IV: Courage
Click on image to read excerpts

Olduvai II: Exodus
Click on image to purchase

Click on image to purchase @ FriesenPress