{"id":55315,"date":"2020-10-15T06:12:23","date_gmt":"2020-10-15T11:12:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=55315"},"modified":"2020-10-15T06:38:12","modified_gmt":"2020-10-15T11:38:12","slug":"why-people-harm-the-environment-although-they-try-to-treat-it-well-an-evolutionary-cognitive-perspective-on-climate-compensation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=55315","title":{"rendered":"Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"JournalAbstract\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00348\/full?fbclid=IwAR3fBL2ldDD0rxjEMYFGHAXAUlYON3wcQWJhuGpLQ-B9C-jZZNArN5m3_mg\">Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation<\/a><\/h3>\n<p class=\"mb0\">Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between \u201cenvironmentally friendly\u201d and \u201charmful\u201d behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions\u2014the misconceptions that \u201cgreen\u201d choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. \u201cEco-guilt\u201d from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.<\/p>\n<div class=\"clear\"><strong><span style=\"color: #222222;\">Introduction<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"JournalFullText\">\n<p class=\"mb0\">The environmental impact of one\u2019s own behavior is difficult to grasp, partly because issues related to climate change are perceived as psychologically distant (cf.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.frontiersin.org\/articles\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00348\/full?fbclid=IwAR3fBL2ldDD0rxjEMYFGHAXAUlYON3wcQWJhuGpLQ-B9C-jZZNArN5m3_mg#B29\">Spence et al., 2012<\/a>). When people try to act in environmentally friendly ways, they often in fact do further harm to the environment. They might purchase some extra groceries because the groceries are \u201ceco-labeled\u201d; think that they can justify taking the airplane abroad for vacation because they have been taking the bicycle to work; and think that they can skip recycling their waste because they started having meat-free Mondays. Entire economic systems have been built on the same principle.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026click on the above link to read the rest of the article\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why People Harm the Environment Although They Try to Treat It Well: An Evolutionary-Cognitive Perspective on Climate Compensation Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[30425,141,4037,2602,30424,30423,30422,769],"class_list":["post-55315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","tag-behavior","tag-climate-change","tag-cognition","tag-evolution","tag-frontiers-in-psychology","tag-linda-langeborg","tag-patrik-sorqvist","tag-sustainability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55315"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55316,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55315\/revisions\/55316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}