{"id":54051,"date":"2020-07-09T08:32:39","date_gmt":"2020-07-09T13:32:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=54051"},"modified":"2020-07-09T08:32:43","modified_gmt":"2020-07-09T13:32:43","slug":"by-many-calculations-lng-is-a-fail-for-bc-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=54051","title":{"rendered":"By Many Calculations, LNG Is a Fail for BC: Report"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thetyee.ca\/Analysis\/2020\/07\/09\/LNG-Fail-For-BC\/\">By Many Calculations, LNG Is a Fail for BC: Report<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The math for liquefied natural gas is bad on emissions, revenues, jobs, even offsetting coal in China, finds a new study.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/thetyee.ca\/Analysis\/2020\/07\/08\/JohnHorganInvestingCanada.jpg\" alt=\"JohnHorganInvestingCanada.jpg\"\/><figcaption>Go figure. BC NDP Premier John Horgan announcing in 2018 a $40-billion investment by the consortium LNG Canada in its Kitimat terminal for processing and export.&nbsp;Photo:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/bcgovphotos\/45057263291\">BC Government<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>David Hughes, one of the nation\u2019s foremost energy&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.parklandinstitute.ca\/davidhughes\">analysts<\/a>, has a simple message for the governments of British Columbia and Canada when it comes to advocating for LNG projects.<a href=\"https:\/\/thetyee.ca\/Analysis\/2020\/07\/09\/LNG-Fail-For-BC\/#series-listview-link\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cDo the math.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hughes has parsed the numbers and they don\u2019t add up on methane emissions, climate change targets, resource royalties, job benefits or even basic economics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe math is clear,\u201d says Hughes, whose latest 57-page&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.policyalternatives.ca\/bc-carbon-conundrum\">report<\/a>&nbsp;on LNG exports highlights a long pipeline of damning figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Emissions targets: Won\u2019t LNG help hit them? The numbers say no<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/support.thetyee.ca\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The&nbsp;Tyee&nbsp;is&nbsp;supported by&nbsp;readers&nbsp;like&nbsp;you&nbsp;Join us and grow independent&nbsp;media in&nbsp;Canada<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The province\u2019s CleanBC plan, for example, demands an 80-per-cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 from 2007 levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Hughes, who was a scientific researcher for 32 years at the Geological Survey of Canada, checked the math on emissions based on energy production forecasts made by the Canada Energy Regulator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>His math is conservative. It excluded any LNG exports. It assumes current major reductions in methane leaks from gas extraction might be plugged. And it further assumes the electrification of some upstream projects. Still, Hughes found that \u201cemissions from oil and gas production would exceed B.C.\u2019s 2050 target by 54 per cent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(A group of scientists writing in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-019-1364-3.epdf?referrer_access_token=mwSO3oudpA4arAe_0crtjNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PdO5WVipRqBUMeBcZf-002NRS2vI09Momxci5bmedA_H-iEdV2alvUSMRvyKJNoUkxZV3z1dAPqG64bk4_5__SI7qquQ1PVEMigxgiuMYon-22YWAll4o3uI149earn6evJ8Ms9C1s4PxxnOwR2kxMLnQm2xFTwFfWnp54xEhfpg%3D%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.nationalgeographic.com\">Nature<\/a>\u00a0found the same thing on a global scale last year: just using existing fossil fuel infrastructure takes the world into climate change hell.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2026click on the above link to read the rest of the article\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Many Calculations, LNG Is a Fail for BC: Report The math for liquefied natural gas is bad on emissions, revenues, jobs, even offsetting coal in China, finds a new study. David Hughes, one of the nation\u2019s foremost energy&nbsp;analysts, has a simple message for the governments of British Columbia and Canada when it comes to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4],"tags":[5549,94,2244,386,1714,1190,5499],"class_list":["post-54051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy-2","category-environment","tag-andrew-nikiforuk","tag-british-columbia","tag-david-hughes","tag-greenhouse-gases","tag-liquified-natural-gas","tag-lng","tag-the-tyee"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=54051"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54052,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54051\/revisions\/54052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=54051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=54051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=54051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}