{"id":53251,"date":"2020-05-13T19:16:58","date_gmt":"2020-05-14T00:16:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=53251"},"modified":"2020-05-13T19:17:08","modified_gmt":"2020-05-14T00:17:08","slug":"992-billion-reasons-why-the-fed-needs-another-market-crash-in-the-next-few-weeks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=53251","title":{"rendered":"992 Billion Reasons Why The Fed Needs Another Market Crash In The Next Few Weeks"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/markets\/992-billion-reasons-why-fed-needs-another-market-crash-next-month\">992 Billion Reasons Why The Fed Needs Another Market Crash In The Next Few Weeks<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Speaking in a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/markets\/watch-live-jerome-powells-economic-update-and-discussion-negative-rates\">video conference organized by the Peterson Institute<\/a>, turbo money printer Jerome Powell today reassured the market that negative rates are not something the Fed &#8211; which expanded its balance sheet by $2.6 trillion in the past two months &#8211; is contemplating now. Of course, that will change after the next market crash or if economic shutdowns return, but for now the Fed&#8217;s message to traders was clear: don&#8217;t push forward fed fund rates negative, which also catalyzed today&#8217;s sharp market drop as a key source of potential&nbsp;<em>forced&nbsp;<\/em>easing was removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, with Powell taking negative rates off the table (for now), it means the Fed has another problem on its hands, one which was first laid out by Deutsche Bank&#8217;s credit strategist Stuart Sparks, who in a recent note said that &#8220;for all the measures taken by the Fed and fiscal authorities to counter the COVID19 shock,&nbsp;<strong><u>policy remains too tight<\/u>.&#8221;<\/strong>&nbsp;And, as Sparks adds, if the Fed opts to avoid negative policy rates &#8211; which appears to be the case &#8211;&nbsp;<strong>&#8220;further easing must be provided by the size and&nbsp; composition of the Fed\u2019s balance sheet&#8221;<\/strong>, meaning more QE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">How much more QE? Well, with short-dated market real yields positive, Deutsche Bank estimates that r*, or the neutral rate of interest, has fallen to around -1%, &#8220;<strong>suggesting additional accommodation required for policy to be \u201ceasy\u201d could be more than 100 bp in terms of \u201cpolicy rate equivalent.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com\/s3fs-public\/inline-images\/r%20star%20may%207_1.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Previously the Fed had estimated that $100 billion in QE has approximately the same short term impact on growth as 3 bps of rate cuts.\u00a0<strong>This equivalence means that in order to provide a 1% of \u201crate equivalent\u201d easing, the Fed would need to grow the balance sheet by roughly $3.3 trillion.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2026click on the above link to read the rest of the article\u2026<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/r%20star%20may%207_1.jpg?itok=ACjmYBVf\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>992 Billion Reasons Why The Fed Needs Another Market Crash In The Next Few Weeks Speaking in a&nbsp;video conference organized by the Peterson Institute, turbo money printer Jerome Powell today reassured the market that negative rates are not something the Fed &#8211; which expanded its balance sheet by $2.6 trillion in the past two months [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[49,501,534,558,3650,4318],"class_list":["post-53251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","tag-balance-sheet","tag-market-crash","tag-monetary-policy","tag-negative-interest-rates","tag-us-federal-reserve","tag-zerohedge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=53251"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53251\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53252,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53251\/revisions\/53252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=53251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=53251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=53251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}