{"id":4614,"date":"2015-01-18T15:14:01","date_gmt":"2015-01-18T20:14:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=4614"},"modified":"2015-01-18T15:14:01","modified_gmt":"2015-01-18T20:14:01","slug":"u-s-department-of-energy-our-forecasts-arent-really-forecasts-or-are-they","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=4614","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Department of Energy: Our forecasts aren&#8217;t really forecasts (or are they?)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\"><a href=\"http:\/\/resourceinsights.blogspot.ca\/2015\/01\/us-department-of-energy-our-forecasts.html\">U.S. Department of Energy: Our forecasts aren&#8217;t really forecasts (or are they?)<\/a><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header-line-1\">Put this in the category of things that can&#8217;t be true, but that are nevertheless affirmed with a straight face: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical arm of the U.S. Department of Energy, does not issue forecasts, at least not long run forecasts.<\/div>\n<div class=\"post-body entry-content\">\n<p>So says Howard Gruenspecht, deputy administrator of the EIA,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.gov\/pressroom\/responses\/nature\/\">in a letter<\/a>\u00a0to\u00a0<i>Nature<\/i>, the respected science journal. Gruenspecht was responding to<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/natural-gas-the-fracking-fallacy-1.16430\">recent coverage<\/a>\u00a0of an alleged EIA forecast which paints a rosy picture of U.S. domestic oil and natural gas production through 2040, a view challenged by the article in question.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the bureaucratese from the letter: &#8220;Contrary to the presentation in the\u00a0<i>Nature<\/i>\u00a0article, EIA does not characterize any of its long run projection scenarios as a forecast.&#8221; Long run projection scenarios&#8230;.huh. What could those actually be if not forecasts? And, why is the deputy administrator making such a big deal of this? We&#8217;ll come back to the second question later.<\/p>\n<p>There has been little notice concerning the flap over coverage of\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.gov\/forecasts\/aeo\/\">the EIA&#8217;s recent nonforecast<\/a>\u00a0and the divergence of that set of &#8220;projections&#8221; from another much more pessimistic forecast\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.beg.utexas.edu\/shale\/pubs.php\">issued by the Bureau of Economic Geology<\/a>\u00a0at the University of Texas at Austin. To cut to the chase,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.oilgasdaily.com\/reports\/Nature_fires_back_at_EIA_shale_gas_critique_999.html\"><i>Nature<\/i>stands by its story<\/a>; and, I see no reason why it shouldn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most important piece of information to come out of this kerfuffle is the insistence by the EIA that it doesn&#8217;t issue forecasts. Imagine my surprise! I have been perusing the EIA&#8217;s statistics on an almost weekly basis for years, and I have occasionally offered critiques of what I was sure were forecasts&#8211;lengthy complicated documents with color graphics and tables and elaborate justifications for energy production numbers far into the future. What&#8217;s more, everyone else called these documents forecasts, too.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;click on the above link to read the rest of the article&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. Department of Energy: Our forecasts aren&#8217;t really forecasts (or are they?) Put this in the category of things that can&#8217;t be true, but that are nevertheless affirmed with a straight face: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical arm of the U.S. Department of Energy, does not issue forecasts, at least not long [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[251,267,2723,2722,2724,1789,2725,2726],"class_list":["post-4614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy-2","tag-eia","tag-energy-information-administration","tag-forecasts","tag-howard-gruenspecht","tag-long-run-scenarios","tag-nature","tag-predictions","tag-projections"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4614"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4615,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4614\/revisions\/4615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}