{"id":42311,"date":"2019-01-06T07:35:03","date_gmt":"2019-01-06T12:35:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=42311"},"modified":"2019-01-06T07:35:03","modified_gmt":"2019-01-06T12:35:03","slug":"feds-balance-sheet-reduction-reaches-402-billion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=42311","title":{"rendered":"Fed\u2019s Balance Sheet Reduction Reaches $402 Billion"},"content":{"rendered":"<header>\n<h3 class=\"entry-title\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/2019\/01\/04\/feds-balance-sheet-reduction-reaches-402-billion\/\">Fed\u2019s Balance Sheet Reduction Reaches $402 Billion<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p><strong>The QE unwind has started to rattle some nerves.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For the past two months, the sound of wailing and gnashing of teeth about the Fed\u2019s QE unwind has been deafening. The Fed started the QE unwind in October 2017. As I covered it <a href=\"https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/tag\/qe-unwind\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">on a monthly basis<\/a>, my ruminations on how it would unwind part of the asset-price inflation and Bernanke\u2019s \u201cwealth effect\u201d that had resulted from QE were frequently pooh-poohed.\u00a0They said that the truly glacial pace of the QE unwind was too slow to make any difference; that QE had just been a \u201cbook-keeping entry,\u201d and that therefore the QE unwind would also be just a book-keeping entry; that QE had never caused any kind of asset price inflation in the first place, and that therefore the QE unwind would not reverse that asset-price inflation, or whatever.<\/p>\n<p>But in October last year, when all kinds of markets started reversing this asset price inflation, suddenly, the QE unwind got blamed, and the Fed \u2013 particularly Fed Chairman Jerome Powell \u2013 has been put under intense pressure to cut it out. Yet it continues:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47383\" src=\"https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/US-Fed-Balance-sheet-2019-01-03.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 496px) 100vw, 496px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/US-Fed-Balance-sheet-2019-01-03.png 496w, https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/US-Fed-Balance-sheet-2019-01-03-260x191.png 260w, https:\/\/wolfstreet.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/US-Fed-Balance-sheet-2019-01-03-160x117.png 160w\" alt=\"\" width=\"496\" height=\"364\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Fed shed $28 billion in assets over the four weekly balance-sheet periods of December. This reduced the assets on its balance sheet to $4,058 billion, the lowest since January 08, 2014, according to the Fed\u2019s balance sheet for the week ended January 3. Since the beginning of this \u201cbalance sheet normalization,\u201d the Fed has now shed $402 billion.<\/p>\n<p>According to the Fed\u2019s plan released when the QE unwind was introduced, the Fed is scheduled to shed \u201cup to\u201d $30 billion in Treasuries and \u201cup to\u201d $20 billion in MBS a month \u2013 now that the QE unwind has reached cruising speed \u2013 for a total of \u201cup to\u201d $50 billion a month. So how did it go in December?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Treasury Securities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2026click on the above link to read the rest of the article\u2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fed\u2019s Balance Sheet Reduction Reaches $402 Billion The QE unwind has started to rattle some nerves. For the past two months, the sound of wailing and gnashing of teeth about the Fed\u2019s QE unwind has been deafening. The Fed started the QE unwind in October 2017. As I covered it on a monthly basis, my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[49,303,661,8701,662,8625,3650,4254,4255],"class_list":["post-42311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","tag-balance-sheet","tag-fed","tag-qe","tag-qt","tag-quantitative-easing","tag-quantitative-tightening","tag-us-federal-reserve","tag-wolf-richter","tag-wolfstreet"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42311"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42312,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42311\/revisions\/42312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}