{"id":37967,"date":"2018-09-19T06:36:14","date_gmt":"2018-09-19T11:36:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=37967"},"modified":"2018-09-19T06:36:14","modified_gmt":"2018-09-19T11:36:14","slug":"what-will-it-take-to-avert-collapse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=37967","title":{"rendered":"What Will it Take to Avert Collapse?"},"content":{"rendered":"<header class=\"post-image\">\n<div class=\"fimg-wrapper fimg-cl\">\n<div class=\"featured-image\">\n<div class=\"fimg-inner\">\n<div class=\"vm-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"vm-middle\">\n<h3 class=\"post-title\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/stories\/2018-09-19\/what-will-it-take-to-avert-collapse\/\">What Will it Take to Avert Collapse?<\/a><\/h3>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Low-Energy-Demand-Feature.jpg\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<section class=\"post-content\">\n<div class=\"et_social_inline et_social_mobile_on et_social_inline_top\">\n<div class=\"et_social_networks et_social_6col et_social_simple et_social_rectangle et_social_top et_social_no_animation et_social_outer_light\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>A lot of people are asking the question these days\u2014including serious folks who work full-time on climate and energy policy. How can the world\u2019s nations reduce greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to forestall climate catastrophe, without undermining either the global economy (which is still 85 percent dependent on fossil fuels) or the hopes of billions of people in poorer countries to raise their economic prospects through \u201cdevelopment\u201d\u2014which historically has depended on increasing per capita energy usage?<\/p>\n<p>The United Nations has passed this vexing question along to the global climate science community as a formal request to write <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/report\/sr15\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a Special Report<\/a> providing \u201cfeasible\u201d pathways to limit global warming to 1.5\u2009degrees Celsius while supporting economic growth and meeting the UN\u2019s Sustainable Development Goals. The science community has responded by publishing papers featuring scenarios to fit those specifications. Until recently, most scenarios have relied on negative emissions technologies, including CCS (capturing carbon from fossil-fueled power plants, then sequestering it), or BECCS (growing biomass crops, burning them for power, then recapturing the carbon and storing it). Critics have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.technologyreview.com\/s\/544736\/the-dubious-promise-of-bioenergy-plus-carbon-capture\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">savaged these plans<\/a> as being too expensive and too environmentally risky.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41560-018-0172-6.epdf?author_access_token=e7XmUN762wFZHVQRnhKBidRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PQDdUB8ux6MZx8X2nROb9RF2LE-Y6myg4HVyBanARY6EQ9bz30zUmU7pxPTouRNw4fZGaQNra3eo6EwazmOqAvNO8vI5mCAjE_x3gxLF12Qg%3D%3D\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A major new 13-page paper in <em>Nature Energy<\/em><\/a>, with 122 pages of supplementary materials, takes an entirely different approach. The goal of the authors, led by Arnolf Grubler, was to model a scenario that limits global warming to 1.5 \u00b0C while meeting economic goals <em>without<\/em>invoking negative emission technologies\u2014relying instead on energy demand reduction. We and our colleagues at Post Carbon Institute have for years promoted demand reduction as the primary viable pathway to averting catastrophic climate change.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026click on the above link to read the rest of the article\u2026<\/p>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Will it Take to Avert Collapse? A lot of people are asking the question these days\u2014including serious folks who work full-time on climate and energy policy. How can the world\u2019s nations reduce greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to forestall climate catastrophe, without undermining either the global economy (which is still 85 percent dependent on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,7],"tags":[150,21723,328,369,16285,6665,1081,826],"class_list":["post-37967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy-2","category-environment","category-survival-2","tag-collapse","tag-david-fridley","tag-fossil-fuels","tag-global-warming","tag-nature-energy","tag-resilience-org","tag-richard-heinberg","tag-united-nations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37967"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37968,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37967\/revisions\/37968"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}