{"id":3667,"date":"2014-12-28T18:40:54","date_gmt":"2014-12-28T23:40:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=3667"},"modified":"2014-12-28T18:40:54","modified_gmt":"2014-12-28T23:40:54","slug":"moneyness-robin-hood-central-banking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=3667","title":{"rendered":"Moneyness: Robin Hood central banking"},"content":{"rendered":"

Moneyness: Robin Hood central banking<\/a>.<\/p>\n


\nThere were plenty of reports in the press this year accusing central banks of behaving like King John, stealing from the poor to help the rich. Rich people’s wealth tends to be geared towards holdings of stocks and bonds whereas the poor are more dependent on job income. By pushing up the prices of financial assets, central bank quantitative easing helped rich people while leaving the poor in the dust.<\/p>\n

There are a lot of problems with the King John critique of quantitative easing.<\/p>\n

First, a good argument can be made that QE had almost no effect on prices. Insofar as purchases wereconsidered temporary<\/a>\u00a0by market participants, then the newly created money would not have been spent on stocks and whatnot, its recipients preferring to keep these balances on hand in order to repay the central bank come the moment of QE-reversal. If so, the large rise in equity prices since 2009 is due entirely to changes in the fundamentals and animal spirits, not QE.<\/p>\n

But let’s say that QE was not irrelevant and can be held responsible for a large chunk of the rise in equity prices over the last few years. Even then, the real economy, and therefore the poor, would have been equal beneficiaries of QE. As I pointed out in\u00a0my previous post<\/a>, financial markets are not black holes. Newly-created money, insofar as there is an excess supply of the stuff, cannot stay ‘stuck’ in financial markets forever. For every buyer of a financial asset there is a seller, and that seller (or the next seller after) will choose to do something ‘real’ with the proceeds, like buying a consumption good, investing in real capital, or hiring an employee\u2014the sorts of purchases that benefit the poor. So if QE succeeded in pushing up financial markets (thus helping the rich), then the real economy (and the poor) must have benefited just as much. The King John argument doesn’t hold much water.<\/p>\n

But wait a minute. If both financial markets and the real economy were equally inflated by QE, then why have wage increases been so tepid relative to equity prices? One explanation is that wages are sticky whereas financial prices are quick to adjust. The relative wealth of the poor, comprised primarily of the discounted flows of wage income, stagnates, at least until wages start to catch up at which point it is the turn of the the relative wealth of the rich to decline.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/a>…click on the above link to read the rest of the article…<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Moneyness: Robin Hood central banking. There were plenty of reports in the press this year accusing central banks of behaving like King John, stealing from the poor to help the rich. Rich people’s wealth tends to be geared towards holdings of stocks and bonds whereas the poor are more dependent on job income. By pushing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2228,2227,661,662,868],"class_list":["post-3667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","tag-market","tag-prices","tag-qe","tag-quantitative-easing","tag-wealth"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3667"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3668,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3667\/revisions\/3668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}