{"id":26460,"date":"2017-10-05T05:51:47","date_gmt":"2017-10-05T10:51:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=26460"},"modified":"2017-10-05T05:52:02","modified_gmt":"2017-10-05T10:52:02","slug":"canada-risks-of-a-parliamentary-democracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=26460","title":{"rendered":"Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"art-postmetadataheader\">\n<h3 class=\"art-postheader\"><a title=\"Permanent Link to Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy\" href=\"http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/?p=51474\" rel=\"bookmark\">Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy <\/a><\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"art-postcontent\">\n<p><strong>A Vulnerable System <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Parliamentary democracy is vulnerable to the extremely dangerous possibility that someone with very little voter support can rise to the top layer of government. All one apparently has to do is to be enough of a populist to get elected by ghetto dwellers.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-51476\" src=\"http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/blog\/media\/2017\/10\/hhh-and-the-god-that-failed-1024x741.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/blog\/media\/2017\/10\/hhh-and-the-god-that-failed-1024x741.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/blog\/media\/2017\/10\/hhh-and-the-god-that-failed-300x217.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/blog\/media\/2017\/10\/hhh-and-the-god-that-failed-768x556.jpg 768w, http:\/\/www.acting-man.com\/blog\/media\/2017\/10\/hhh-and-the-god-that-failed.jpg 1143w\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"463\" \/>Economist and philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe dissects democracy in his book <em>Democracy, the God that Failed, <\/em>which shines a light on the system\u2019s grave deficiencies with respect to guarding liberty. As Hoppe puts it: \u201c<em>Democracy has nothing to do with freedom. Democracy is a soft variant of communism, and rarely in the history of ideas has it been taken for anything else<\/em>.\u201d At first glance this may strike many people as an exaggeration, but considering the trends that have emerged over the past several decades, it seems difficult to refute this assertion. Particularly since the beginning of the so-called \u201cwar on terrorism\u201d, individual liberty has suffered numerous setbacks in Western democracies, while the power of the State has grown to almost unheard of proportions. In a democracy everybody is in theory free to join the psychopathic competition for power (in contrast to the largely rigid power structures prevailing in feudal societies), but all things considered, that is a highly questionable advantage. In fact, in many ways it isn\u2019t an advantage at all. [PT]<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, political correctness and a belief in multiculturalism in the larger society are helpful. One doesn\u2019t have to be very good in political strategizing, or have strong organizational abilities, or even be intelligent. By jumping through a few hoops, anyone can end up as prime minister in a parliamentary democracy, a major risk currently staring Canada in the face.<\/p>\n<p>Harjit Singh Sajjan is currently Canada\u2019s minister of defense. He was elected in Vancouver South, which is one of the districts with the largest immigrant populations: about 75% of its inhabitants are either first or second generation immigrants.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;click on the above link to read the rest of the article&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy A Vulnerable System Parliamentary democracy is vulnerable to the extremely dangerous possibility that someone with very little voter support can rise to the top layer of government. All one apparently has to do is to be enough of a populist to get elected by ghetto dwellers. Economist and philosopher [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[5728,103,3299,204,14518,483,16298,13781],"class_list":["post-26460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty","tag-acting-man","tag-canada","tag-communism","tag-democracy","tag-jayant-bhandari","tag-liberty-2","tag-parliamentary-democracy","tag-populism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=26460"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26461,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26460\/revisions\/26461"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=26460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=26460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=26460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}