{"id":25968,"date":"2017-09-22T06:08:36","date_gmt":"2017-09-22T11:08:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=25968"},"modified":"2017-09-22T06:08:36","modified_gmt":"2017-09-22T11:08:36","slug":"factcheck-climate-models-have-not-exaggerated-global-warming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/?p=25968","title":{"rendered":"Factcheck: Climate models have not \u2018exaggerated\u2019 global warming"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"artTop\">\n<div class=\"shadeBg\">\n<div class=\"owlDesc\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/factcheck-climate-models-have-not-exaggerated-global-warming\">Factcheck: Climate models have not \u2018exaggerated\u2019 global warming<\/a><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #333333; font-size: 16px;\">A new <\/span><a style=\"font-size: 16px;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/ngeo\/journal\/vaop\/ncurrent\/full\/ngeo3031.html\">study<\/a><span style=\"color: #333333; font-size: 16px;\"> published in the Nature Geosciences journal this week by largely UK-based climate scientists has led to claims in the media that climate models are \u201cwrong\u201d and have significantly overestimated the observed warming of the planet.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"innerArt\">\n<p>Here Carbon Brief shows why such claims are a misrepresentation of the paper\u2019s main results. In reality, the results obtained from the type of model-observation comparisons performed in the paper depend greatly on the dataset and model outputs used by the authors.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the media <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/science\/2017\/09\/18\/immediacy-threat-climate-change-exaggerated-faulty-models\/\">coverage<\/a> surrounding the paper, Millar et al, has focused on the idea that climate models are overestimating observed temperatures by around 0.3C, or nearly 33% of the observed warming since the late 1800s. For example, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/debate\/article-4901278\/Report-shows-world-isn-t-warm-greens-warned.html\">Daily Mail<\/a>reported:<\/p>\n<p class=\"quote\">According to these models, temperatures across the world should now be at least 1.3 degrees above the mid-19th century average, which is taken as a base level in such calculations. But the British report demonstrates that the rise is only between 0.9 and 1 degree.<\/p>\n<p>Lead author Dr Richard Millar and his co-authors have pushed back against such media coverage, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk\/opinion\/view\/379\">releasing a statement<\/a> which says:<\/p>\n<p class=\"quote\">A number of media reports have asserted that our [study] indicates that global temperatures are not rising as fast as predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and hence that action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is no longer urgent. Both assertions are false. Our results are entirely in line with the IPCC\u2019s 2013 prediction that temperatures in the 2020s would be 0.9-1.3 degrees above pre-industrial [levels].<\/p>\n<p>[Carbon Brief\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/guest-post-why-the-one-point-five-warming-limit-is-not-yet-a-geophysical-impossibility\">guest post<\/a> by Dr Millar earlier this week includes the paper\u2019s key figures. Additionally, one of his co-authors, Prof Piers Forster, provides further reaction at the end of this article.]<\/p>\n<p>Contrary to media claims, the study found that warming is consistent with the range of IPCC models, albeit a bit lower than the average of all the models.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;click on the above link to read the rest of the article&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Factcheck: Climate models have not \u2018exaggerated\u2019 global warming A new study published in the Nature Geosciences journal this week by largely UK-based climate scientists has led to claims in the media that climate models are \u201cwrong\u201d and have significantly overestimated the observed warming of the planet. Here Carbon Brief shows why such claims are a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[10797,141,9104,16104,369,16103],"class_list":["post-25968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","tag-carbon-brief","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-modelling","tag-factcheck","tag-global-warming","tag-zeke-hausfacher"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25968"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25968\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25969,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25968\/revisions\/25969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/olduvai.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}